
Last modified: 2000-01-18 by dov gutterman
Keywords: guatemala | america | triband | mayas | quetzal |
Links: FOTW homepage |
search |
disclaimer and copyright |
write us |
mirrors
![[Guatemala]](../images/gt-s.gif)
by Jorge Candeias, 22 May 1999
Flag and arms adopted at 15 September 1968
![[Guatemala - civil flag]](../images/gt.gif)
by Jorge Candeias , 22 May 1999
The right colors, ratio and national arms (seal), in an "html"
version of the guatemalan flag, can be seen at: http://www.quetzalnet.com/bandera.html
Guido Solares, 27 July 1998
As far as I know, Guatemala follows a practice common to
several other nations (Germany and Austria are examples) of having two official
flags for use at land: the one known as civil flag is the blue-white-blue
with no further ornaments, to be used primarily by the citizens,
and the one known as state flag, which adds the coat of arms to
the civil flag. Usually, this flag is to be used in any official
condition to represent the country, though the specifics of it's
usage varies from country to country.
Jorge Candeias, 17 October 1998
From the number of messages we've been receiving saying that
the blue-white-blue flag is wrong, it looks like in Guatemala the
state flag is much more in use than the civil flag, or even that
the civil flag is not used at all.
Jorge Candeias, 3 April 1999
![[Guatemala - coat of arms]](../images/gt).gif)
by Jorge Candeias, 22 May 1999
The Flag Bulletin #184 says that on 26 December 1997
the spelling on the arms was altered from SETIEMBRE to SEPTIEMBRE.
Nozomi Kariyasu, 14 March 1999
According to my sources, the branches (coffee?) surrounding
the arms should bear four red berries each.
Ivan Sache, 4 April 1999
My sources show no berries. Can someone else confirm Ivan's
info? And tell me where these berries would be placed if it gets
confirmed?
Jorge Candeias, 5 April 1999
I can at least give my sources: Album des Pavillons, DK
Pocket Book, Pedersen
and Smith all show these berries. And I just discovered
there were not four, but five berries per branch.
It's rather difficult to describe their location, this would need
a detailed botanical description of a coffee branch.
One berry is located at the lowest node. For the other, let us
count the "voids" (only the big ones) between
successive leaves, beginning at the top of the branch; first
berry fits in "void" number 3, second berry in "void"
number 5, third berry in "void" number 6, and fourth
berry in "void" number 13.
Ivan Sache, 5 April 1999
I can't confirm or deny Ivan's info, however, in Pedersen,
1971 English edition, there do appear to be beans at the base of
the major leaf groups, but in mixed numbers, usually pairs. The
bird is like a parrot (Pedersen describes it as "a
quetzal, the 'bird of freedom', derived from a local Indian
legend") with the head turned back over its left
shoulder.
Michael Smuda, 5 April 1999
Hum... that's very different from all other Guatemalan emblems
I've seen so far, that look just like my image. I suspect that
either it is a wrong depiction (the "parrot" makes me
wonder - see below) or an early version.
The quetzal is a real bird that lives in the forests of Central
America. It was considered sacred by the pre-colombian
civilizations, and the priest that "incarnated" the god
Quetzalcoatl wore it's feathers. The depictions of the
bird in the Guatemalan symbol I've seen so far show the real bird
in the position I depicted it.
Anyone knows of changes or standartization of the Guatemalan
symbol since 71?
Jorge Candeias, 6 April 1999
The image sent by Michael is pretty much like the one shown by
Kannik. He says it is from 1871,
and based on the emblem (he says arms) from 1843. He has no blue
oval and no background colour, though.
According to Pedersen, 1979, the
emblem was changed at 9 September 1968 to the one sent by Jorge.
Pedersen has a light blue background in the emblem, (symbolizing
fantasy), but not when it is in the flag. Pedersen mentions 18
November 1871 for the older emblem.
Pedersen shows many berries, by the way. I counted 14 on each
branch. He also has a light yellow tone in the scroll.
Ole Andersen, 8 April 1999
All Guatemala's CoA's on the web, got no berries at all.
All the official sites uses the same image. Example is at: http://www.concyt.gob.gt/edicion/logos/escudo.gif
Unofficial sites uses a better COA. Example at: http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/6886/escudo.gif
The best one (see here) and info
in spanish are at: http://www.mdngt.org/agremilusa/symbols.html#EL
ESCUDO
Dov Gutterman , 9 April 1999
Ole reported already 14 berries per branch, and from Pederson
and FTAAATW I can confirm that (about 14, the images are very dim
and the berries very small). The position of the berries are
mostly against the branch, not on it, as you giffed them. They
are at irregular intervals, a bit winding around the branch. The
background of the COA is definitely lightblue. BTW the branches
are laurel-branches. Laurels have black or darkblue berries
naturally, but the Guatemaltec brand is red.
Jarig Bakker , 9 April 1999
Kannik ('56) has no background for the emblem, but he has _22_
berries (of which two lack colour - certainly an error).
Pedersen ('79) has the emblem on a light blue circular background.
He has 28 berries.
The DK book ('98) has no background, and 10 berries.
The background is omitted in the flag
Ole Andersen, 12 April 1999
It looks like the presence or absence of these berries and
their number if present is not regulated, varying from rendition
to rendition.All the newer renditions of the COA that I've seen
show no berries at all. See also http://www.quetzalnet.com/bandera.html.
Jorge Candeias, 22 May 1999
A colleague returned recently from an assignment in Guatamala
and brought with him a photograph of a flag which was presented
to him as the flag of the Mayas.
The Maya flag is divided diagonally into four fields, the one
closest to the hoist is white (for peace), the field in the fly
end is yellow (for the sun), the top field is blue (for the sky)
and the bottom field is red (for fire). The flag was fringed in
light blue. The photographed flag also had a red stripe at the
hoist, but this seems to be a sleeve for hoisting.
My colleague was explained that these flags are not for sale in
shops, so they are all home made. I don't know what the status of
the flag is or anything about its history.
And yes, it does look like the P&O house flag with the
colours in a different order.
Jan Oskar Engene, 5 December 1998
![[Che flag]](../images/guevara.gif)
the "Che" flag
by Jorge Candeias
If I recall correctly a similar design to the above with
different inscription was used by one of the guerrilla movements
in Guatemala.
Jaume Olle', 3 August 1998